Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Jan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 01:52, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmy Jan

Jimmy Jan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, only three sources, and two are his social media pages. Search results brought up articles about the subject from WP:NYPOST and WP:DAILYMAIL, not suitable for Wikipedia. User talk:Malmmf 15:55, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On this basis, although the article might be a stub its notable enough to keep? He's clearly a viable search time and the story went viral to attract international coverage from British and New Zealand media outlets. Passes WP:GNG. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 22:26, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:20, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 15:58, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Jan, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.