Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jitegemee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:44, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jitegemee

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I hope I'm proved wrong, because they seem like a worthy organisation, but I couldn't verify that they meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Has been tagged for notability for 7 years without resolution. Pinging those who have been involved in discussing its notability before: Ironholds, Foxj,Fritzpoll. Boleyn (talk) 13:12, 31 March 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 13:12, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment-part of me just wants to say keep due to how this seems like a very notable thing to do, but I just can't since I don't know if it belongs here. Wgolf (talk) 20:06, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep [1] gets us half way there, between WP:SYSTEMIC bias concerns (I suspect there is local non-English coverage), and section V a 1 of [2], I believe that there is excellent reason to suspect that this topic meets WP:ORG. --j⚛e decker ^talk 15:48, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:59, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:22, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – per sources found by Joe Decker. – Margin1522 (talk) 22:07, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[[[Withdraw nomination per all above. Boleyn (talk) 05:17, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.