Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jive filter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:36, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jive filter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has stood unsourced, without any references to any reliable sources for about 17 years now. A before search only brought up a minor mention in "Philosophical Perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communication" and another in Black Futures (Wortham and Drew, 2021) that cites Wikipedia. A general search on the concept of "novelty filters" and a few variations on the search terms to filter out non-relevant results didn't result in any more reliable coverage. A previous AfD resulted in Keep, but no sources were provided since then, and the rationale behind the Keep votes seem quite weak; the result seemingly based only on the vote count. The subject does not pass WP:GNG. TryKid ^{[dubious – discuss]} 02:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:27, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete One hit in Google news about a white columnist using the filter when writing for a black dating site. I vaguely remember these filters being on Google translate at one point, encheferising the text so it read like the Swedish Chef. No sources found. Delete. Oaktree b (talk) 13:11, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I hate to have to vote to delete this as I find the Swedish Chef encheferiser extremely funny (and link it on my userpage), but the sources just aren't there. I have this listed on my list of articles to expand, but there's been no expansion because I just couldn't find any sources. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 12:53, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  and the giant head that pops out of the side is creepy man! Lol wikicoding is on point on your userpage, well done. Oaktree b (talk) 19:50, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I wish I could take credit for the giant Jimbo Wales head, but that is completely stolen from User:Susmuffin! Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:19, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No assertion of notability nor coverage in any reliable sources whatsoever.—Mythdon (talk • contribs) 00:54, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.