Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jock Mooney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 02:05, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jock Mooney

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article written by a single purpose account and is, more or less, a promotional CV of this visual artist. I'm not seeing much at all in the form of substantive, reliable media coverage and he is described as 'new' or 'emerging' where he is mentioned. Currently fails WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST Sionk (talk) 22:50, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 23:18, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. GoldenRing (talk) 09:39, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Additionally, none of the exhibition venues in the long list are particularly notable.--Theredproject (talk) 19:13, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.