Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Rogan Questions Everything

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Rogan Questions Everything (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Been without any secondary reliable sources for 8 years; just episode guides. No indication of any real notability, fails WP:GNG.

Content should be placed into Joe Rogan, if appropriate. Leave a redirect from this article's title (Joe Rogan Questions Everything) to Joe Rogan because this article is mentioned in a few in-article lists; possibly also from redirects Joe Rogan questions everything (TV series) and Joe Rogan questions everything. Platonk (talk) 19:31, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Platonk (talk) 19:31, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Platonk (talk) 19:31, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:20, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Okay, if it's had no secondary sources for eight years, that's a great reason to go find some. I took a few minutes and found SIGCOV here, as well as a few good sources here, here and here. It's also mentioned here and here. A confirmation of its premiere date is here and here. Anything fails GNG if you don't look for sources... jp×g 01:33, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've incorporated these sources into the article (although, certainly, it could do with some further copyediting. jp×g 01:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as the article has been improved with the addition of content sourced to significant coverage in reliable sources such as newspapers so that WP:GNG is passed and therefore deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 05:25, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 03:13, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per JPxG's improvements. Jclemens (talk) 02:50, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.