Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johan Svantesson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:25, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Johan Svantesson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Footballer with 72 minutes in Allsvenskan. Fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG. Geschichte (talk) 08:41, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Sweden. Shellwood (talk) 10:29, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:41, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:06, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per sources added. GiantSnowman 16:02, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep Found few sources 1, 2, 3, 4 Charsaddian (talk) 21:20, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Sources above are a brief mention in an injury report/interview with a teammate, a Q&A interview with almost zero commentary, a press release from Allsvenskan, and a press release from MUSC (his former club). Nowhere close to GNG. JoelleJay (talk) 00:16, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, here are three more independent sources which are either only about Svantesson or significantly covers him: [1] [2] [3] AlexandraAVX (talk) 08:18, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Here's a more recent article from 2021 covering his injury and path to recovery, the same article also seems to have been published in other local newspapers: [4] AlexandraAVX (talk) 08:53, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I've expanded the article significantly and added the relevant sources I found, including one I couldn't find online but did exist in a local newspaper. Pinging @GiantSnowman: as requested. AlexandraAVX (talk) 13:08, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I can't see what the first source says, but if it's another interview it's unlikely to be independent enough. The middle source has some material, but the way it is structured it seems like it's paraphrasing quotes directly from him rather than contributing independent analysis. The last source is wholly routine transfer news with no SIGCOV. JoelleJay (talk) 00:36, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per sources added by AlexandraAVX and Charsaddian. Frank Anchor 16:30, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, passes GNG per above sources.--Ortizesp (talk) 02:52, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.