Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Cunyus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:52, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John Cunyus

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article for Non notable self-publishing author. As his works found no publisher,according to the article, he founded his own press to publish them. Essentially none of his books are in any WorldCat library--a few are in 5 libraries, a few in 2, most in one or none. The press has also published a few other authors, all equally non-notable, none of whom has any book in more than 5 worldcat libraries. No other notability. DGG ( talk ) 02:09, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:02, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:02, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:PROMO; strictly a vanity page. No indications of notability or significant, and no independent reliable sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:03, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There's just not anything out there for Cunyus that is actually about him and talks about him in depth. He exists as an author and all of that other stuff, but none of that is the type of thing that would give automatic notability. In other words, notability is not automatically inherited by any of the things in the article. It's also very promotional, giving off the strong impression that this was written in order to promote Cunyus. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:48, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the "not a vote" tag because of the influx of new and previously inactive users flocking to argue for the Latin project's page to be kept. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:48, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.