Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Rappoport

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:08, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Rappoport

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Conspiracy theorist with self-published books. All references are to subject's blog, websites, YouTube videos, etc. BlueSalix (talk) 05:13, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 June 21. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:34, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 12:15, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There doesn't seem to be the sort of third-party coverage necessary to meet notability guidelines. AndyTheGrump (talk) 14:06, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Doesn't appear notable to me. Looking up the publishers doesn't turn up anything particularly impressive either. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 15:29, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it stands - there's nothing usable as a BLP source, and it appears there hasn't been in eight years - David Gerard (talk) 17:21, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as lacking any decent sources. Ever. Guy (Help!) 14:19, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.