Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Levy
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 14:59, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Josh Levy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article does not demonstrate that the subject meets Wikipedia’s notability guidelines. Wikipedia evaluates notability primarily through two pathways: the general notability guideline (GNG), which requires significant coverage in reliable, independent, secondary sources with strong editorial oversight, and subject-specific notability guidelines (SNG), which are tailored to specific fields like academics, athletes, or entertainers.
In this case, the article appears to concern a religious figure, not an academic, so WP:NACADEMIC is not applicable. The more relevant SNG is WP:NPERSON, which still requires significant coverage in reliable, independent sources that are not directly affiliated with the subject.
After reviewing the sources:
- CheckCompany provides a minimal corporate profile with no substantial coverage. (Too sparse)
- ReformJudaism.org.uk is a primary source from an organization the subject leads. (Not independent)
- Jewish News focuses on organizational developments and only briefly mentions Levy. (Wrong subject)
- Leo Baeck College profile is uncredited and potentially self-authored. (Unreliable, likely self-published)
- JewishGen is about a synagogue building, not Levy himself. (Too sparse, Wrong subject)
These sources fail to provide the significant, in-depth, and independent coverage required for notability under either GNG or NPERSON. Without substantial third-party coverage—particularly from newspapers, religious publications, or similar sources—there is no verifiable basis for inclusion. As it stands, the article should be deleted for lack of notability.
Alexnewmon2623 (talk) 02:39, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 March 30. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:52, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Judaism, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:45, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Delete-Reason above Alexnewmon2623 (talk) 20:58, 30 March 2025 (UTC)- Please see WP:AFDLIST - as the nominator recommending deletion, you should not also !vote. RebeccaGreen (talk) 10:34, 5 April 2025 (UTC) (She's right, your nomination is your vote, you can't cast a duplicate one. Liz Read! Talk! 06:43, 6 April 2025 (UTC))
- Keep As the chief executive of the Movement for Reform Judaism and co-leader of the new Progressive Judaism (UK) movement [1], [2], I think he is probably notable per WP:RELPEOPLE. He is not the Chief Rabbi, who is inherently notable, but as co-leader (with Charley Baginsky) of a group that covers 30% [3] of Jewish people affiliated with synagogues in the UK, this is still a subtantial position. RebeccaGreen (talk) 11:11, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- Keep The article could be better but he is notable as the joint leader of a significant religious movement in the UK.
- Rafts of Calm (talk) 13:17, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:44, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Keep - As leader of the British Reform movement, Josh Levy sits alongside Ephraim Mirvis as Chief Rabbi, Jonathan Wittenberg as Senior Rabbi for Masorti Judaism, and Charley Baginsky as the leader of the British Liberal Jewish movement as the four leaders covering about 90% of British Jews. Just google him. This article needs improving, not deleting.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.