Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Physics and Applications

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 21:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Journal of Physics and Applications

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article about a year old journal. No evidence of meeting WP:JOURNALCRIT or WP:GNG. Created by an editor who has started numerous journal stubs, all linking back to the same website. Notably, the website has a very poor Web of Trust rating due to spam. - Mr X 12:26, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No information provided beyond the name of the journal. Following the web site, this journal title is not in evidence. LaMona (talk) 15:12, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 18:51, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I was able to find more on the publisher's site (and updated the link), but this still only shows that it exists and does not provide evidence of passing WP:NJournals. Re the nominator's remarks about the reputation of the publisher: it is published in cooperation with a reputable publisher, Springer; on the other hand, its other publisher was once included on Beall's list of predatory open access journals but pressured him through legal channels into removing it — see this link. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:22, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:16, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:16, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I found nothing better than a few links here. SwisterTwister talk 05:25, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.