Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judith Miller (philosopher)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non-admin closure) Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:40, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Judith Miller (philosopher)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's not clear if she passes WP:ACADEMIC (although in humanities the situation is seldom clear-cut) and there are serious potential WP:BLP violations in the article due to lack of sources combined with mostly negative statements. I've googled around a bit, but couldn't find much in the way of sources about her, so I think it's prudent to delete the whole article. JMP EAX (talk) 00:43, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I should add that the same very problematic (without a citation) BLP statements about her are made in Paris 8 University. JMP EAX (talk) 00:51, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also I found [1], which is an article about Judith Miller suing Élisabeth Roudinesco (the only source cited in this article) for defamation, although the lawsuit/article is about stuff Roudinesco wrote about Lacan, not focused on Judith Miller herself. JMP EAX (talk) 01:19, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Being listed in Concept and Form: The Cahiers pour l’Analyse and Contemporary French Thought provides some evidence of notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:40, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep per Eastmain. --Sammy1339 (talk) 17:55, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ymblanter (talk) 06:49, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - as an academic she is less than nothing, but as a radical femme, she is notable. Bearian (talk) 00:54, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.