Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juglarwave

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 22:52, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Juglarwave

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is plainly non-notable. I haven't been able to find a single mention of it anywhere -- much less a verifiable source. It seems like it should be speedied but it simply doesn't fit WP:G3 or WP:A11 --Non-Dropframe _talk 20:48, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. --Non-Dropframe _talk 21:14, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. --Non-Dropframe _talk 21:14, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: On current evidence (an article referenced to a Youtube video and Facebook) and searches (nothing at all on Highbeam or Questia, a couple of social media entries on Google) this looks worthy for CSD A11. AllyD (talk) 07:32, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom, agree this looks worthy for A11 (invented).Pincrete (talk) 18:56, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.