Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jukot
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 01:01, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jukot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't find sources to add to confirm this meets WP:N. Boleyn (talk) 19:15, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Nepal. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:40, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- It appears to have census data so may be considered legally recognized. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:17, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep village of 3,000 people passes WP:GEOLAND and it clearly comes up as a village in scholarly articles and in searches. SportingFlyer T·C 09:39, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment appears to be a former local government area, a VDC, and so meets WP:GEOLAND, but I couldn't find the sources alluded to by the users above that would verify it. The best I could find were [1] [2] and [3] which are, IMO, barely enough for WP:V, there are some additional mentions in The Himalayan Times but no in depth coverage that I could see. Should be tagged for better sourcing at a minimum. Eluchil404 (talk) 23:41, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - it would be helpful if the census data could be added (the Nepal 2021 census results on the official website seem to have been consolidated at district level) but there is more than enough press sourcing to meet GEOLAND. Ingratis (talk) 11:03, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.