Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia McNamara

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:19, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Julia McNamara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article uses no sources about the character (the only source is about the actors' paycheck, and it doesn't even prove the part sourced) and a quick Google search gives little results about the character that proves her notability. Spinixster (chat!) 12:08, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Television. Spinixster (chat!) 12:08, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I couldn't find any sources, bar potentially one book, which is nowhere near enough to constitute a whole article. Pokelego999 (talk) 18:28, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.