Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Wilhelm
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Salvio giuliano 21:15, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Julia Wilhelm
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Julia Wilhelm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NAUTHOR and WP:NPROF. Refs 1, 2, and 4 are her own writings; ref 3 is a local newspaper article about her becoming head of a folk high school. The works listed in the bibliography are an essay published in a collection of student papers, a master's thesis, and a dissertation. A WP:BEFORE turned up more routine local coverage in connection with her role at the folk high school. Cheers, gnu57 20:04, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Women, Journalism, and Germany. gnu57 20:04, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. I made some improvements to the article, but found nothing to suggest notability. CT55555(talk) 03:16, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. per nom. Nothing here that would fulfill WP:NAUTHOR or WP:NPROF. --hroest 17:18, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. The most likely path to notability would seem to be WP:AUTHOR, but the article lists only one book, and I tried and failed to find any published reviews of it. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:33, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete This a WP:BLP and there is nothing. The most blank WP:BEFORE I've seen in a while. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creepTalk 21:16, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, Fails WP:NAUTHOR, Alex-h (talk) 12:53, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.