Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Károly Huber

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 02:30, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Károly Huber

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable scholar by WP:ACADEMIC. Apparently not at any notable university. All sources in the article are Hungarian (i.e., hard to verify), and seemingly written by the subject himself. Also note that the Hungarian Wikipedia had an article on this subject deleted in 2011. And finally, note that article creators Tibitoma~enwiki and Vitamax are single-purpose accounts. bender235 (talk) 22:00, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:03, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:03, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:04, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: lacking reliable sourcing as most sources are from subject himself; also clearly a promotional article, bordering on idolatry (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Vitamax, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Tibitoma~enwiki). Quis separabit? 18:41, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.