Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K7 Total Security

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:25, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

K7 Total Security

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An ancient G11 (Hi @TransporterMan and Theroadislong:), but one for which I cannot find notability. There are false hits such as this one where the software isn't in the reviews but rather a commenter saying "so download it" but sourcing seems limited to churnalism. I am unable to find in depth reviews, nor a merger target. Star Mississippi 02:38, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 02:38, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 02:38, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with nom, does not demonstrate notability with the sources provided, and is written like an advert with little to no encyclopedic value. Toadspike (talk) 04:43, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: About six months ago Raja K7 - note the username suggesting a COI - made several edits to the article removing much of what was there and also created Draft:K7_Computing, but has not reappeared since that one day to do more (or anything else, for that matter). The draft, while defective, is much better than the existing article. Something should probably be done with both if anything is to be done with either. Frankly, it would do the encyclopedia no harm if both were deleted. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 18:36, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.