Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KGet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Konqueror. Tone 10:24, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KGet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously PRODded with concern: "Non-notable software; no claim to notability offered, no links to third-party sources to establish notability." That's still true, as the sources are only primary sources, promotional sources, unreliable sources, and the download manager only receives passing mentions in reliable sources and literature. wumbolo ^^^ 13:20, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —AE (talk • contributions) 13:28, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails GNG and I can't find any sources online that would change that. Lovelylinda1980 (talk) 13:02, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge: Merge to Konqueror. While it can be used outside Konqueror that would seem to be a good merge candidate, though it can be used outside of Konqueror that works. Time resource willing I'd be prepared to do that merge.Djm-leighpark (talk) 19:06, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  Merging more than a brief mention would be WP:COATRACK as it is not strictly related to the browser. wumbolo ^^^ 19:14, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes ... one section with a short paragraph should do the job nicely without WP:UNDUE weight .. possibly called Download Manager with a Kget anchor but I'm not committing precisely to that.Djm-leighpark (talk) 20:15, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to Konqueror as best option based on lack of RS. Widefox; talk 12:16, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:59, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge +1. Nsda (talk) 11:41, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Due to controversies on a set of articles of which this is one can I respectively suggest admins only close this and a full 168 hours is allowed before relist and non-admins carefully consider before re-listing. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 00:31, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.