Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KPOGCL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:28, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

KPOGCL

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is not supported by independent reliable sources. See decline of Draft:KPOGCL, which is almost identical to this article, although with more references. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:41, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Pakistani dailies and news agencies, such as The Nation, Pakistan Press International, Business Recorder, DAWN, The Express Tribune and The Frontier Post, currently used as sources for this article, are independent reliable sources. There is enough sources and coverage to satisfy WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Beagel (talk) 23:36, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable subject and has multiple independent reliable sources. I see no reason for considering deletion.Nicky mathew (talk) 17:08, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 18:17, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 18:17, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notability established without copyvio at this attempt. Bazj (talk) 23:01, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.