Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KSPK-LD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to List of television stations in Colorado#LPTV stations. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:51, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

KSPK-LD (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:17, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Colorado. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:17, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to List of television stations in Colorado#LPTV stations: this seems like a valid alternative to deletion, as KSPK-LD and most of its repeaters are listed there or at least elsewhere in that page. My only concern is that translator K24IY-D, which is in Raton, New Mexico, would be a surprise there; that one is listed at List of television stations in New Mexico#Translators instead. I suppose there could also be a brief mention in some form at the article for co-owned radio station KSPK-FM, but that article is itself severely undersourced at a time when radio station articles appear to be in the early stages of getting a similar GNG-enforcement housecleaning (not entirely dissimilar to the recent culling of never-notable TV station articles, and all a long-overdue followup to the 2021 RfC that showed no consensus for any looser notability standards than GNG for broadcast stations), so that might not be ideal. Overall, this is another remnant of the much-looser standards of 2007 (and its creation was the lone contribution of Paulkspk (talk · contribs), so there is a probably-now-distant COI angle here too). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:30, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or if that fails then maybe redirect if some key info can be merged into where it's directed to. Karl Twist (talk) 11:35, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:27, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:05, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shadow311 (talk) 16:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as proposed: Subject does not have the WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG. A redirect is the best WP:ATD here. Let'srun (talk) 21:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.