Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K and G Cycles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 06:34, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

K and G Cycles

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article makes no assertion of notability. Search of available sources finds no evidence that this company is notable for anything, is unique, or has made a contribution or achievement beyond what any other motorcycling products retailer has done. There is no in depth, sustained coverage in reliable, independent sources, failing the WP:GNG as well as WP:ORG. Dennis Bratland (talk) 02:06, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:24, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- this content belongs on the company web site, not here. An unremarkable business by all counts. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:25, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Concur with above. The given reference are all either not independent or trivial mentions. Insufficient coverage. MB 04:26, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.