Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kailas C. Thaware

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:21, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kailas C. Thaware

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an autobiography (author self-identifies here) that fails to satisfy Notability (academics) or Notability (people) guidelines. No significant coverage in independent, reliable, third-party sources. No evidence of significant research impact per WP:NACADEMIC: Google Scholar lists 3 papers, H-index of 1. This is not intended to disrespect Mr. Thaware, but Wikipedia is not a LinkedIn or CV hosting site, and while the subject may one day meet notability criteria, at this time it appears to be simply too soon for an encyclopedia article. --Animalparty! (talk) 17:56, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 17:57, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 17:57, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 17:57, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - With no independent reliable sources, this fails WP:V, WP:NPOV, and WP:NOR. Plus, as basically a CV, fails WP:NOT. Smmurphy^(Talk) 21:39, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Most of the article is life details that do not add to notability. The only possible exception is the claim that he is a professor of economics. But I checked RePEc's list of the top 25% of economists in India and didn't find him there. His Google scholar profile shows three publications with only one citation among them, by far not enough for WP:PROF#C1. So there seems to be nothing there. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:49, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.