Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kajiya Productions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:26, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kajiya Productions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just 4 links at Google News. Seems like it doesn't meet notability criteria. Bbarmadillo (talk) 18:26, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:36, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (as creator), created as there are enough references throughout Wikipedia mentioning the subject (with references). --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 06:28, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The sources that exist are all interviews, which, while fine on their own, do not prove notability when they are the ONLY sources available._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 08:40, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Alexander O. Smith unless/until more sources pop up and indicate notability. --Alexandra IDV^talk 11:05, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:38, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, was leaning toward merge but I actually think it passes notability even as a stub. I'm going to have to ask Bbarmadillo to specify *which* notability criterion it "seems like it doesn't meet". Axem Titanium (talk) 06:33, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NCORP, as any information that would indicate the significance of the company is ultimately based on interviews, and even then it is lacking. Per NCORP "Primary sources cannot be used to establish notability. In business setting, frequent primary sources include: corporate annual or financial reports, proxy statements, memoirs or interviews by executives". Just not enough secondary sources.--SamHolt6 (talk) 13:15, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.