Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalbe Rushaid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 13:28, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kalbe Rushaid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Listed as CSD, no number given. There is enough page histoary here that the article could have notability, however in its current form it lacks any inline citations which is a red flag (though not a disqualifer, as it were). Listing for community input. TomStar81 (Talk) 09:56, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:37, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:37, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the article doesn't make any real claim of notability, and the references don't show independent coverage. Apparently he was a political candidate, but I'm not sure for what, and WP:NPOL never applies for candidates. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 02:31, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.