Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kambriel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star Mississippi 02:21, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kambriel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fashion deisgner, barely any RS, fails GNG. Winner of Gothic Beauty's 2005 Fashion Designer of the Year award is also not a notable award. Chrisalder (talk) 16:57, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Fashion. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:48, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:32, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Marketing page. Not meeting WP:GNG. Is there any special criteria for designers? If no, WP:GNG it is and it is not being realized here. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 01:43, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:GNG. Lacking indepth coverage. LibStar (talk) 03:36, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, promotional and lacks significant coverage. Pikavoom ^Talk 09:44, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:GNG lacks indepth coverage.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.