Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kampyle (software) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. SoWhy 18:01, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kampyle (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is written only for promotional and advertising purposes. no improvement from last AfD. discussion was merely misleading presenting copy paste work from press coverage or non-notable media. Light2021 (talk) 21:14, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:44, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:44, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:47, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Comment – Below are some sources. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:06, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non notable Pres, Tech crunch and venture beat write anything on their blog, nothing significant about them. Light2021 (talk) 09:37, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Nothing particularly notable about this software. As another editor pointed out, blogs cannot be judged to be verifiable sources, and hence the article subject fails to meet WP:NOTE imo. SamHolt6 (talk) 19:14, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per the significant coverage in reliable sources provided by Northamerica1000 (talk · contribs). The company passes Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline with the detailed coverage in the John Wiley & Sons books and TechCrunch and VentureBeat.

  I also found this article from he:Geektime and this article from The Wall Street Journal, which notes that Kampyle was acquired by Medallia ("Medallia Buys Customer Feedback Analytics Startup Kampyle").

  Cunard (talk) 04:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- the sources in the article or provided by NA above do not establish notability. TechCrunch and VentureBeat are routine news or include articles that are not independent of the subject. For example, one of the articles listed, with an intriguing title "Kampyle Transforms User Feedback Into Lead Generation", starts with "When I met Kampyle CEO Ariel Finkelstein last week..." etc. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:42, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Although none of the Venture Beat nor Tech Crunch articles meet the criteria for establishing notability, in my opinion the two books referenced above by Northamerica1000 are good and meet the criteria. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 18:13, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep in agreement with HighKing. There's sufficient notability for this business. Nuke (talk) 23:47, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.