Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamran Shahzad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Redirect at editors' discretion. Sandstein 18:47, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kamran Shahzad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another non-notable cricketer, no coverage exists, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 04:18, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

They're different people, with differing birthdates, and spelling of their surname. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 10:54, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Also, check this profile, image matches with Kamran Shazad's. Störm (talk) 05:12, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:17, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:17, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:17, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to List of Gujranwala cricketers Has played 1 List-A match, but I couldn't find any coverage, sources may exist offline or in Pakistani sources but I couldn't find any in a search. Using a similar precedent to that used by WP:FOOTY where a player with one or a few matches but no coverage, is redirected/deleted, and there's a suitable redirect for WP:ATD here. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 10:54, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete either he has played one List A match, and had four overs carted round the park with no success; or there is confusion between the subject and a more notable namesake. Given the range of possibilities, and the meaningful likelihood that this will lead to further confusion, I'd say that this one is a delete. DevaCat1 (talk) 11:48, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There is not sufficient coverage to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamran Shahzad, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.