Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karthik Alaghari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:49, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Karthik Alaghari

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable person, probably a conflict of intrest . Fails WP:BIO Razer^{Text me} 14:47, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:00, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:00, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The references provided were copied from nos 2-4 on Sachin Bansal - no evidence that they were relevant to this person. Without these, this is sourced only to the subject's Facebook page. The Indian newspaper search has nothing about him and the normal Google search returns just the usual social media pages. No evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 16:03, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Unable t find even passing mentions for this person in any reliable source. Anup [Talk] 22:53, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails GNG. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 16:45, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:50, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as outrageously and noticeably PR in that not only is this article listing his career information as if this were his job listing, it then only cites something that was imaginably the quickest and essentially the best the user may have thought of: Facebook. SwisterTwister talk 02:08, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.