Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Addo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 04:52, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kate Addo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to meet WP:GNG, and her position does not qualify for WP:NPOL. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:30, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:43, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:43, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:43, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:44, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, there is WP:SIGCOV in multiple cited sources, easily meets WP:GNG. NemesisAT (talk) 11:08, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, subject is cited in multiple sources and is a head of a reputable government agency in Ghana meets WP:GNG criteria. Owula kpakpo (talk) 12:00, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, the subject of the article has been quoted in multiple independent, reliable and newsworthy publications Ghanian Times,Star Fm,Modern Ghana because of her role as the Director of Public Affairs of the Parliament of Ghana. Addo is an individual of public interest and as such should not fail WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. HeyitsRay (talk) 14:50, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Meets GNG with plenty of independent sourcing. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 12:25, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Easily passes WP:GNG Nitesh003 (talk) 13:31, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. No, this does not "easily" pass anything, but it passes. Drmies (talk) 13:36, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep WP:NEXIST. Clearly a highly visible commentator in Ghanaian media over multiple years; simplest of searching shows this to be the case. Passes the GNG. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 20:54, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.