Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate O'Neil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Userfy to Megalibrarygirl/Authentic Films. --MelanieN (talk) 00:04, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kate O'Neil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Multiple issues since 2009, no references –Be..anyone 💩 01:09, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No evidence of notability, even after a search. Any "Kate O'Neil"s I can find are unrelated to the content in the article. Vanamonde93 (talk) 01:18, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:22, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:23, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as nothing at all actually suggesting solid independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 04:20, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep but move to Affinity FilmsAuthentic Films. I've found sources, but all of them so far talk about her and Kerwin in relation to Affinity FilmsAuthentic Films. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 23:18, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Megalibrarygirl: Do you mean Authentic Films as in this 2006 NYT article? My take on that is that the article is about real estate in Cleveland rather than O'Neil. Can you link to the other sources you mentioned? SmartSE (talk) 22:15, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Yes, I did mean Authentic Films, Smartse. Thanks for correcting me! I've struck out the wrong term above. :) Megalibrarygirl (talk)
• Delete If there was an article for Authentic Films I maybe would have suggested a move.. but as it stands there is nothing to say that the company is notable either. Megalibrarygirl you can request this to be moved to your user space if you think you would be able to create the company article? ツStacey (talk) 17:15, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I'd be happy to write the article, Staceydolxx. It wouldn't take long since I have the sources. :) Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:17, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to Megalibrarygirl user space for development of Authentic Films article. Thanks for offering to do this, I look forward to seeing the new article ツStacey (talk) 17:24, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.