Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Manos
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 20:59, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Keith Manos
- Keith Manos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Self-published author with no secondary coverage. Blackguard 19:27, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:42, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:42, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:42, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:42, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails GNG, NAUTHOR. I've seen more developed bios deleted. This is an easy call. South Nashua (talk) 17:27, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:37, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - I empathize with him, but he fails WP:PROF. Bearian (talk) 00:04, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. His main scholarly activity seems to be textbook writing, but for notability through that (WP:PROF#C4, rarely used) we would need evidence of wide use of his texts in higher education. But we appear to have no such evidence, no published reviews of his books (the linked web site gives only personal testimonials), and no other evidence of notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:38, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.