Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Connell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly Connell

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Onyl part of any significance seems to be Picket Fences at a push. Working actor, but not notable. Sending WP:APPNOTE to SummerPhD. Boleyn (talk) 11:03, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 13:24, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Certainly nothing to suggest better satisfying WP:CREATIVE and I would've frankly PRODed as that was also applicable. SwisterTwister talk 06:24, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Fails WP:NACTOR ,WP:DIRECTOR and WP:SIGCOV.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:41, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.