Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerf loss

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 09:48, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kerf loss (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTDIC dictionary definition rsjaffetalk 04:50, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 05:17, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, duplicates content in Kerf, which redirects to Saw#Terminology rsjaffetalk 21:13, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala (talk) 22:26, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.