Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ketshephaone Jacob
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:37, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
Ketshephaone Jacob
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ketshephaone Jacob (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Utterly fails WP:GNG or WP:BASIC. Cited sources are either ridiculously promotional pieces from unreliable publications, or they're WP:DOGBITESMAN. A cursory search did not help either. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:28, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Africa, and Botswana. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:28, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: I am not sure about the reliability of The Patriot on Sunday and Botswana, but even if they are reliable they are more about Bulb World which makes me think that this article should be about Bulb World rather than Jacob, as it may pass WP:GNG. Is move an option in AfDs? FuzzyMagma (talk) 23:32, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete as the sources are much more about Bulb World and don't have significant coverage about Jacob, even though they may be reliable ThomasHarrisGrantsPass (talk) 20:14, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete, no signs of notability whatsoever. Allan Nonymous (talk) 17:57, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.