Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kev Brown

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. 18 days of discussion hasn't yielded much other than approximately equal numbers of editors who say "he's notable" and editors who say "he's not", plus a list of sources that haven't been discussed in detail and may or may not contribute to notability. –Darkwind (talk) 23:48, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kev Brown (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG. Despite being associated with some notable artists, the "Low Budget Crew" doesn't appear notable enough to confer notability upon Brown. KidAd (talk) 23:41, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:42, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:42, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete since subject fails WP:NMUSICIAN and even WP:GNG. Niche sources such as "Ambrosia for Heads" are not worth much, especially since the subject is on “Ready Or Not”, a page that will list practically anything. (As they state, "[Ready or Not is] showcasing new videos and having you, the people, decide whether they are ready for primetime.") The artist might be ready for primetime ("nobody knows anything" in show business, anyway) but for Wikipedia, he's not. Not yet, anyway. -The Gnome (talk) 12:36, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 08:17, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The AfD was extended in order to receive new input. Do you suppose repeating our previously stated positions adds any value to the discussion? If you have something new to say, go ahead, but repeating ourselves only adds clutter. -The Gnome (talk) 08:35, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kev Brown, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.