Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kilchoman distillery

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:10, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kilchoman distillery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability criteria for a business. Ditch ∝ 17:25, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:44, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:44, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent, reliable, secondary sources would appear to meet the primary criteria. Mutt Lunker (talk) 13:51, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:CORP. Ben MacDui 14:27, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep seems uncontroversial. Plenty of sources from a range of places. — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 15:40, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:05, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, meets WP:NBUSINESS and WP:GNG, article reflects this especially with improvements made to the article subsequent to this afd nomination. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:10, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Whisk(e)y distilleries are always notable. Some of the references in the article are non-promotional and have SIGCOV.   // Timothy :: talk  05:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per all the reasons above. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:47, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - another nice example of a WP:HEY Spiderone 23:08, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.