Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirby Building Systems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (Nomination withdrawn). (non-admin closure) Anupmehra -Let's talk! 20:28, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kirby Building Systems

Nomination withdrawn by nominator based on sources identified by NorthAmerica. Flat Out let's discuss it 09:46, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP. Primary sources support information but not notability. Flat Out let's discuss it 11:20, 4 April 2014 (UTC) Flat Out let's discuss it 11:20, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:34, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nominator Uncletomwood (talk) 16:39, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:54, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, Fails CORP. Keep per Northamerica1000 who's found quite alot of sources -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 03:19, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Passes WP:CORPDEPTH per bylined news sources found in news searches and a source found in Google Scholar:

The Economic Times
Business Standard
Business Standard
Indian Express
The Hindu
The Hindu
The Hindu
The Hindu
Gulf Daily News
Prefabrication in Developing Countries: a case study of India. University of Utah. p. 49.
Trade Arabia
An Additional news source (unclear if it's a reprinted press release): One India

– Also, per WP:NRVE, topic notability is based upon the availability of sources, rather than whether or not sources are present in Wikipedia articles. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:33, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete recycled press releases aren't independent. Stuartyeates (talk) 11:08, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Hi User:Stuartyeates: Can you provide further evidence that the sources I listed are all "recycled press releases". Bylined news articles authored by journalists are typically not recycled press releases, although they may utilize press releases at times. Also, the University of Utah study is certainly not such a source, not by a long shot. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:57, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles written by the http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/ appear to have real names reporters (or real-seeming) and dates of publiction in the print version. The articles being looked at here have 'Our Bureau' with no publishing date. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:10, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - nominator has withdrawn at top of the discussion. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:10, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.