Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kit Malone (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:25, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
Kit Malone
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Kit Malone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A person claiming to be the page's subject has requested deletion, citing safety concerns for her and her family (she's a trans rights activist). I think it's pretty reasonable – she's not non-notable, this wouldn't be my first choice for AfD normally, but she mostly appears in the news as an advocate, not as a person of interest herself. Most of the coverage comes from passing mentions in local news stories that are largely about trans rights or non-independent biographies from the ACLU and her own website. As is procedure for BLPREQUESTDELETE, leaving it up to the good folks at AfD :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 06:18, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sexuality and gender, United States of America, and Indiana. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 06:18, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Per WP: BLPREQUESTDELETE. If the page’s subject is concerned about her safety, I think it is only reasonable that we honour it. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 07:25, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- This is my own article, that I wrote and got into DYK, but I am willing to see it deleted if it has become a safety concern. Dominic·t 20:23, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. I'm sorry that this happened to a good person. Unless the person is clearly a public figure, I'm an advocate of privacy. It's going to be a very long 3 years, 11 months, and 19 days of this nonsense that we will have to endure. Soft deletion is appropriate in such cases. Bearian (talk) 14:37, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.