Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitchen Table Science

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 00:05, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kitchen Table Science

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable phrase. TheGGoose (talk) 17:51, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This is either a non-notable neologism and it should be deleted, or it is a common-enough phrase that it should be transwikied to wikt:kitchen table science or wikt:kitchen-table science and the material not suitable for Wiktionary trimmed out. My hunch is that it isn't common enough to belong to Wiktionary Recommended close: Delete, without objection to temporary userficiaton for the purpose of trans-wiki'ing to Wiktionary, contingent on the term meeting Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion at the time. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:28, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't find any reference for the statement about the Massachusetts Academy of Science. "Kitchen table science" or "kitchen science" has been around for a long time and can refer to the science behind cooking, learning to cook, simple general science experiments for kids. In the absence of references that show that the definition in the article is a major meaning, I don't think it should go into Wiktionary either. StarryGrandma (talk) 22:04, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:15, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:15, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:16, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:18, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't belong here, as above. If it's notable, it's a dictionary entry, and if it's not, nuke it. PianoDan (talk) 13:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as my searches found nothing outstandingly good to suggest improvement. Pinging Jllm06 for comment. SwisterTwister talk 04:40, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - agree with above reasons.Jllm06 (talk) 12:07, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.