Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KnightsBridge Foreign Exchange

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:35, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KnightsBridge Foreign Exchange

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously PRODed by User:Robert McClenon. I concur with their rationale: "Not a notable corporation; see corporate notability. Promotional in tone." SmartSE (talk) 18:29, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 22:17, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 22:17, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 22:17, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 22:17, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Coverage is limited to passing mentions. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Hrodvarsson (talk) 01:37, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not significantly improved after it was PROD'd and dePROD'd. Has author been asked about conflict of interest? Robert McClenon (talk) 21:17, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - not our typical retail forex speculative broker article, but a fairly normal business with fairly routine press coverage. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 02:29, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.