Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kobali

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:33, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kobali (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another apparent GNS-copying failure. Recorded only as a "populated place" which on GNS is specifically a level below village or town and implies no legal recognition (necessary for WP:GEOLAND). I have not been able to locate any non-GNS sources that provide any indication that this is a legally-recognized town, nor any that discuss it in any detail. ♠PMC(talk) 18:47, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Uses material from the Wikipedia article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kobali, released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.