Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kolongastenna

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:49, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kolongastenna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:PLACEOUTCOMES. No notable source. Hongsy (talk) 14:53, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Hongsy (talk) 14:53, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:24, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This is a straight-forward failure of WP:V, since there is no way provided in the article (and I did search around on the statistics page linked there to try to find something that might contain information about it, without results) to verify that this place actually existed. FOARP (talk) 10:54, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.