Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kool Magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:48, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kool Magazine

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has no sources other than the magazines own bare-bones web site (which does not seem to have been updated in this century). After a web search I could find no mention of this publication anywhere other than the previously-mentioned homepage (though there are apparently several magazines with this name of varying notability). Even if this magazine were notable, virtually none of the article's present content is usable and it would need to be started from scratch anyway. -- LWG ^talk 01:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Entire article is a copy-paste farce, plus the magazine no longer exists. How this entry has stuck around since 2009 is beyond words. sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 05:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete: The article is incredibly poorly written and offers no reliable sources to back it up. Scorpion293 (talk) 03:20, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.