Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KoreFusion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 04:55, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KoreFusion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of meeting notability guidelines. References given are press releases and mentions in context of getting quotes from people working for the company without any WP:significant coverage of the company. Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:54, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:20, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:20, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:21, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Citations as of 18 Oct do not support notability—after reviewing all the citations in the current article, none are sufficient singly or in combination to support notability; they are a combination of items about products and people rather than primary company topics, with a couple of press releases (self-published) included. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:56, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Insufficient sources to establish notability—looking at newspapers.com, books.google, internet archive texts, and Bing search ... did not find sufficient content to support notability. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:35, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: A company profile article, describing the firm's founders and consultancy lines and sourced mainly to connected alumni sites and speaking engagements. I am finding no evidence that this is more than a firm going about its business. Fails WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 07:35, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:SPIP and promotional, no indications of notability, references fail the criteria for establishing notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:35, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.