Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kori caste

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 09:19, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kori caste

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is already an article Kori.Why do we need many articles for the same community? Mahensingha 20:07, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ///EuroCarGT 21:47, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete absent input from someone who knows more about the subject. Kori is a disambiguation page, leading eventually to Koli people. The Kori caste article has many severe issues, and I suspect some of its content would be rather surprising to archaeologists and historians. Most of it seems to be concerned with (I think mythical) ancient history of various Indian people groups - if this belongs anywhere in Wikipedia, it isn't here. GoldenRing (talk) 15:00, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am not convinced that the two Kori pages are about the same group of people. But that aside this article is an NPOV disaster, and I don't think it's fixable. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:15, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete What i find that the article kori caste also represent the same group of people, which is clearly mentioned also in the heading no.3. but here i find a lot of unreliable material stolen from the literature basically depicting Rajputs or other Kshatriya communities and hence the article lacks mention of correct sources. Also it does not meet the Wiki tone as the article is written just to advertise the false glory of the caste without any or sufficient proofs. Thanx mahensingha - Mahensingha 19:02, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Koli people. Yikes. If this article was made sooner, your rationale is a criterion for speedy deletion. But there is content that is really similar to another page, so they can just exchange w/ each other instead of destruction. Mr. Guye (talk) 19:57, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:47, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 18:14, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.