Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kris Deschouwer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:44, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kris Deschouwer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:57, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, Politics, and Belgium. UtherSRG (talk) 16:57, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Both the Chaire d'honneur de la Ville de Lausanne and the Binnenlandse Francqui Leerstoel aan de ULB [1] might plausibly pass WP:PROF#C5, and I found maybe five published reviews of three of his books on JSTOR and Google Scholar, enough for a weak pass of WP:AUTHOR. Article needs updating (he is emeritus professor now) but WP:DINC. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:06, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Both of those are listed as "prizes" here: https://researchportal.vub.be/en/persons/kris-deschouwer. So I think you're right about the C5. -- asilvering (talk) 20:33, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep also passes C#8 as editor of the European Journal of Political Research between 2003 and 2009. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 08:03, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.