Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krishna Pandey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:45, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Krishna Pandey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yes, he has achieved one record which is recorded by the Guinness World Records. But this does not seem sufficiently notable for an encyclopedia entry. The subject's blog suggests that his purpose in breaking the record was solely to obtain publicity for Buddha, Mt Everest and Nepal (see http://reversespeller.com/Home/About, linked as a source for his place of birth). Does Wikipedia need an article for every record-holder recognised by Guinness? Article was earlier PRODded as BLPPROD, but does have the one RS of Guinness World Records. PamD 12:16, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable enough. Harsh (talk) 13:46, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ///EuroCarGT 20:24, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Recognition by Guinness World Records is probably enough to establish notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:00, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BLP1E. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:51, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non notable. -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 21:13, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Holding a Guiness record is not really a good claim to notability at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:10, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.