Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krishnampalli (2nd nomination)

Krishnampalli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet Wikipedia:Notability. Could find no significant coverage or sources to establish notability and certainly not to class it as either populous or legally recognised under Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Coldupnorth (talk) 08:50, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Tamil Nadu. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:43, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. -Samoht27 (talk) 16:00, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - places don't have to be "populous", merely populated, and no-one can actually say what "legally recognised" is supposed to mean outside the US... Ingratis (talk) 09:37, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Is it included on Indian census documentation? If so then that's a good sign its recognized to some legal capacity. -Samoht27 (talk) 15:59, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

and can you please add the link to the first AfD nomination? Ingratis (talk) 09:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It can be found here, for easy access. Réunion! 22:37, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom - if SIGCOV does end up being found, I'd support a redirect to Krishnampalle, per Mccapra in the previous nomination. Réunion! 22:40, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]