Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kung-Fu Cocktail Grip
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:59, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Kung-Fu Cocktail Grip
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Kung-Fu Cocktail Grip (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This nomination is mostly procedural. The article for the band (Hog Molly) was recently nominated for deletion, and the result of that discussion is that the band is not notable and their article was merged to Tad (band) with whom they are affiliated. Per WP:A9 the album article should be deleted by rule, though I am bringing it here because it does have brief reviews in the reliable AllMusic [1] and NME [2]. Otherwise this old album received little notice. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:01, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:01, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - as per nom. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:18, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Delete: per nomination not notable, didn’t found significant Andy Kearns (talk) 07:37, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- striking !vote by sock, now blocked.GirthSummit (blether) 12:55, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Nom is right - A9 now applies, the artist doesn't have an article and the article makes no assertion of importance or significance. Routine coverage at Allmusic and Discogs doesn't establish notability. GirthSummit (blether) 08:48, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
*Delete will be require soon.Andy Kearns (talk) 10:27, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- Andy Kearns, you can't !vote twice. I'd suggest you strike through your last post (in case you're not sure how, you do it like
this). This discussion will probably stay open for another few days - it was opened on the 14th, and they're generally left for a week before closure. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 11:22, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- Andy Kearns, you can't !vote twice. I'd suggest you strike through your last post (in case you're not sure how, you do it like
- Note User:Rasi56 and Andy Kearns have been blocked at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Andy Kearns--DBigXrayᗙ 13:00, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.