Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LEDA 1026855

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 06:33, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LEDA 1026855 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NASTRO, isn't present on the NGC catalog or any other notable catalog, I couldn't find any information on the web either. WxTrinity (talk to me!) 05:11, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. WxTrinity (talk to me!) 05:11, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: there seems to be nothing particularly notable about this galaxy. It only appears in a few surveys as a data entry. A single supernova candidate is insufficient these days. Praemonitus (talk) 14:20, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. InTheAstronomy32 (talk) 14:28, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. hamster717 ^{(discuss anything!🐹✈️ * my contribs)} 19:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. ArkHyena (talk) 21:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.